← Things I make

01 / Salesforce · POC tooling

From discovery to a POC someone else can explore

An AI-assisted Salesforce proof of concept (POC) workbench connecting development, testing, setup, and handoff around a bounded question.

Status
Workbench / ongoing build
My contribution
Workflow design, tool integration, and documentation with AI assistance
A working modelstart with the person
  1. 01Understand the task
  2. 02Prepare the POC
  3. 03Explore the question
  4. 04Leave a useful handoff

Can someone else run it, explain it, and understand its limits?

Conceptual workflow, not an application screenshot or a record of a live run.

The task comes before the screen

At Diabsolut, I work on Salesforce POCs around the work someone is trying to get done. A discovery conversation gives me a starting point. A POC gives the person doing that work something concrete to question.

My earlier employment at Salesforce was in Account Executive roles. This workbench belongs to the later chapter: building on the Salesforce platform as an Outcomes Engineer at Diabsolut.

What I put together

I have been developing an AI-assisted workbench to make POC preparation more repeatable. It brings a browser-based development environment, Salesforce CLI, code analysis, AI coding tools, and browser testing into one working setup. Project files and private user state have different homes. Setup and handoff documentation are part of the work, not something to add after the interesting part is finished.

I directed the build and developed the workflow with AI assistance. The underlying editor, Salesforce tools, models, and testing tools are other people's products. The contribution is in configuring and connecting them around a practical job.

The decision that matters

A POC environment is not permission to change any environment. Before a build proceeds, the target and ownership need to be explicit. What access does this person have? What is available in this org? Which parts of the proposed path depend on assumptions?

That is also where the teaching background comes back in. A useful walkthrough needs to explain the confusing setup step, what to try next, and what the POC cannot establish. Someone should not need me beside them to understand the question we are asking.

A preparation sheet you can use

This is a public, conceptual preparation sheet, not a customer deliverable or an extract from an internal playbook. Open each question before putting a POC in front of someone.

1. What is the person trying to finish?

Write one task in ordinary language. Name the starting point and what would count as finishing. Avoid listing product features in place of the task.

2. What needs checking before the build?

Confirm the permitted environment, available capabilities, access, and data handling. Use fictional records for a public POC. An unknown permission is a reason to pause.

3. What is working, and what is simulated?

Separate the path you exercised from placeholder data, proposed integrations, and assumptions. A polished screen does not prove a delivery design.

4. What does the next person need?

Leave setup, a short walkthrough, reset instructions, known limits, and the next question to investigate. Make the boundaries as easy to find as the happy path.

Where this stands

The workbench and supporting workflow are ongoing builds. A POC explores a bounded question; it is not proof of production readiness. I am not presenting a customer implementation, a security certification, or a measured team outcome here. Private orgs, code, records, and internal POCs stay private.

Related note: A prototype is a question, not a promise.